Swedish Parties Trade Blame Over Failed Efforts to Halt Deportations

Published: November 13, 2026, 10:30 am

A sharp political dispute has emerged between leading Left Party and Centre Party members of parliament, as both sides trade accusations over a squandered opportunity to block controversial deportations. The conflict centers on the failure to form a Magdalena Andersson-led government, a move that critics argue could have paved the way for more humane immigration policies.

Samuel Gonzalez Westling, the Left Party’s parliamentary group leader, took to Facebook to challenge Niels Paarup-Petersen, the immigration spokesperson for the Centre Party. Gonzalez Westling accused the Centre Party of abandoning its immigration reform promises by expressing a willingness to support a government that would inevitably rely on the anti-immigration Sweden Democrats to pass legislation. He questioned whether the party had considered the cost of relying on such support, specifically regarding the future of teenage deportations and the overall direction of migration policy. His remarks followed a survey cited by Paarup-Petersen, which suggested that Left Party voters would have been open to dropping the party’s demand for cabinet ministerial positions to secure a government.

Paarup-Petersen responded by placing the blame squarely on the Left Party, alleging that they sabotaged the formation of a red-green government solely to secure a ministerial post for their leader, Nooshi Dadgostar. He argued that a government could have been established already, allowing for immediate work on the "law on attachment" (lag kring anknytning), had the Left Party not prioritized ministerial seats over all other considerations. He further noted that his party had even offered to support a one-party Social Democrat administration.

This public spat intensified after Nooshi Dadgostar announced on Thursday that she would not abandon her party's demand for ministerial roles before the deadline set by Centre Party leader Elisabeth Thand Ringqvist. This impasse has significantly increased the likelihood that the Centre Party will ultimately support or join a government led by Moderate Party leader Ulf Kristersson.

The "law on attachment" mentioned by Paarup-Petersen refers to a proposal floated by Social Democrat migration spokesperson Ida Karkiainen. The plan aims to allow long-term ties to Sweden to serve as grounds for residency, or potentially reintroduce a safety clause for "particularly distressing circumstances." Such a policy shift would provide relief to young adults who grew up in Sweden and face deportation upon turning 21, as well as long-term British residents who have been denied post-Brexit residency after decades in the country.

"Yes, what's going to happen on teen deportations when you put Nooshi's ministerial post above everything else? We would have had a government now and already be working on the law on attachment if you hadn't put your own ministerial positions before everything and everyone else. We have even offered to back a one-party Social Democrat government."

Photo: Collected